



















































** 0* *o v /'™ A <* '••**. 

0^ C ° N 0 * **0 A^ . 1 J* * ^ ,0 

a .A» .'*^’. -W 


•' 4 A "V'™' a' 

r 0 ^ «il"', ^o a* , 
, 0 . %s$$$Xv»r- ° N *j 

a *'J^m3 1" ^ A 'i 



p. >•' 

^_a>* ; 


. \p* 

, • A ^-v • 

<y <* v 

Y%s* A^ <* '•”** 

A i * -» „ <y O o 

A *r 0 



a 

A ^V •• ■•. -* *- t 

: 'W 1 ;$MWb° • 

? • V> ^ 

* .A <p 



r ^o< 

4 o. 


1^. A-V Amur. . 

V^|fP,‘ * + °yg^ «. 

* -1. i 4 A <»'•*»* A> 

5 A . > ' • « 'P* Cr . 

O ^ Sae/r??^ " rr 0 

* Aa ? Jr (f //o^> * <i * * 


V; 


> 

«. < 



•'•o 

A ^ $"*+* "^S^A 0 A* 10 -* 

^ 11 .A C' fS) <U * ■> CV * 

«> "♦j.'To' 1 A O^, *•<*■• A 3 >fj, ‘o" 0 ,t °^, 

" -. a A ( >Vr A cT .vfifiPV. +. 

- 'A* • 

* c? 

* v ^ • 

A V A 



O' ^ 

lllijiil^ o A A <V >U ?a 

^illiv^ * x V v\ oK/ JjILXr * <t? 0 

, A .. - • , <*. A . . . . -> 0 V4> 

^ ‘ — - ^ C u o A A 


> V v 

^ ^ ♦ 

a & <y * a 

; V\ v : g 


* • o 



'X N 

O V 

>» w \P *7\ 

• <&7M: * *■*■ - 

O *»*■*• A * o N o 0 

% Sy ,»* a % A ^ 

^ A «■ 

J Ip V • 





* ^y ^ o‘0 |aF * V ° 

A <^**v *** *+ ^ 

> « 1 ' a -9 0 ^ c 0 " 0 ♦ ^C 


NVS _^. 4 

ow™; 

<w - '< , . s % A <, 'o • * - A 

c 0 ' •^, , ' ’°o A ‘-^ArA-p c°‘ • 
^o 4 - 






0^ ^o. V 


A> V v 

° ^ A V * K 

; vv • ^ 


o w a 1 r 

c w .. ^ ^ C 

• _cA?\XV ~ ^ 


\0 7* 

9 ' 1 ° A 0 ^ * • - o ^ °^ * 9 # 1 • ^° ** 

<^p * fiffliS ° ^yC. AA * /h,° * fila • 

>v ° ^ mii ^ - a^a v : MizmPz l ^ ^ ° «■ 


A A- °W%fW‘ :j \ '. 

<P ■ i A#'|>^. A- -*4, - 

<* -« • - * ,<A \D ’ 

l ". A> ,oi^ o 0 "”* ”*r 

♦ v ^ 

* +>. A 


15^; xV«\ “ 0 

vr.s- a <\ 


* ^ a 

* V* O' 

o « _ 


\0 ^ 

51 <»v * 


« • • 


9 O 


. 5» 
















; • 
* V V O 




— • *■ ‘ * ■* *”<£ 

% ° vj* . * 

° Or • ^ 0 

\0 v*> 

> V* * 

+ r\ <i< 

. * /x" 

\ v ^ ® ' 1 

v * ’ *°' o AV 

i/ * 

^ ; 

* ww^** ^ ^ -.W/ ^ % • 

% '••*> .... V* '••*• 

«T 4 O 


,‘ <& V : . 
* ,*♦ ** ■ 



“•• ^ O .... 

C° ° 0 * 

*. 





< O 
<x? <& 

oho° cP O «'TVi • <Cr 

0* . vL!rl/* *> V % *’•<>. 0^ , • • , 

v*v :*»°, ^y* 

o A v/\ 





* x\^ * 4 * ° 

* V <* °* »5 ^ 4 

\ ' <> 'o , * - 

* • 1 " . ** V 




*■ t+o* 
,■ 

• <ir 

* o N 0 ° <y 

0 ^ e°o -r «. \ v 

S 5 . y> \> O * • o 


»*. «U. 0 * 


v % . 

’ ^ ** 

: 

* , * : 

* 0 

V '•••** A V 

^ "% r cr t°"°’ ^ 

■5-. . 0 .% S 5$$W\. O 







- o< 





£ -S V 



[.* *« °- 

* / ^ '* — • ■V' ^ '• ^ v y" %. *^'' .o' 5 

> ♦iCCV^if'A . 0 ^ ^ A/ * a* o % 

; ..❖'■’V •,^W. ; : .b^P *. 

o ‘.V.T* 1 A '<■ ‘-o.. •' <? ts 'r^?'* °'.f ".* 

^ •. V r,o^ ..i^r.. ♦«?, .. -!.. % .0 



., °o . 

• ^O ^ 


K 



* V* o^ 


S n 0 -V ^ o * 

,0 41 0 * 0 0 0, V O * 

sy ^ 

' v\ V ^ 

*; °. “o'S 




” 0.^'^. '¥//»» • efi^r. 

■ V 'T. s^ A ^ 'o.T* .0^ \D 

0 k c 0 * O „ ^5 A V * a *<f> n "^ o » o , ^- 1 

C • O .^.^^7^ -, *P ' , ' J c — * - ° 



< O 

„ <?? ^ 

« o 

A. v ^ * 0 N o J ■ 

v ^ a * 

^4* A V ♦ J 
° ^ * " v* V 

V^ 1 


° ^ A * 

o vp_ ,-^3 






^ c • 

*. +»o* • 

.°" °^ ’yzM&' >° 'V,. 

r^ y" <1 r o +^Ci4f** s * S\ 

^ *•■•• y °* ••■’• *° ^ 

^ V«>** 0 - cv <9 * • VI ^ 

^ A VO •„ A®’ % ■ 

A V * (A m /h <& * 

v*v 4WA°. 

<•9 v^ 

* «? ^ 

4 V V 



• «5 °x. 

- - A CV . ^. , „ 

" 0 ’ \? ... %.*"'' „*° 

* 


+ *■ ^ 41 ^ 























































































BULLETINS OF THE 
CONNECTICUT STATE LIBRARY 
HARTFORD 


6 f- 

Cs 



Number 5 

LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE 1 


Employers’ Liability and Workmen’s 
Compensation 

List of references to material in the 
Connecticut State Library . 



Hartford, Conn, 
Published by the Library 
1913 


"i— 


17^ t 
.LiCt 


’•Bkajry or 00N6&SSS 
RECEIVED 

Jf,M 8 1934 

|-. . ' ;n M <"*C <' 





NOTE 


The following list of references on Employers 5 Liability 
and Workmen’s Compensation has been prepared by the Con¬ 
necticut State Library more especially for the use of the members 
of the General Assembly of 1913. Only the more recent material 
in the library has been included, and no attempt has been made 
to analyze the articles in general encyclopaedias. 

Similar lists on topics of current interest will be issued 
from time to time. 

Members are reminded that the Special Legislative Refer¬ 
ence Department of the State Library, located in the new State 
Library and Supreme Court building, is at their service. In this 
department there have been assembled and conveniently arranged 
for ready reference not only the laws, journals, printed bills, 
special and departmental reports of Connecticut, but also the 
special reports, literature, laws, and proposed laws relating to the 
principal questions now before the General Assemblies of the 
several states. As the material in this section is being added to 
daily, it is hoped that this department may be used freely. Mes¬ 
sengers between the State Capitol and State Library will be on 
duty during the session. 



Connecticut State Library, 
Hartford, Jan. 14, 1913. 

















































- ; 






















.. 








Employers’ Stability anh Workmen’s 
Compensation 

LIST OF REFERENCES TO MATERIAL IN THE CONNECTICUT STATE 
LIBRARY 


GENERAL AND UNITED STATES 

Adams, E. A. & Sprackling, W. E. Employers’ liability and 
workmen’s compensation. 69 p. Providence 1912. 

Rhode Island — State library. Legislative reference bul¬ 
letin No. 5. 

11 Contains a digest of the laws of the states; with an original 
draft of a proposed bill and arguments for the provisions 
thereof. ’ ’ 

Allport, W. H. American railway relief funds. 

Journal of political economy 20:1+9-78, 101-31+, Jan.-Feb. 
1912. 

American academy of political and social science. Accident 
insurance and liability insurance. 

Annals 26:303-39, Sept. 1905. 

- Industrial accidents and their prevention. 

Annals 38:71-111+, July 1911. 

- Legal and constitutional questions involved in employers’ 

liability and workmen’s compensation. 

Annals 38:117-65, July 1911. 

- Legislation concerning employers’ liability. 

Annals 38:169-278, July 1911. 

American association for labor legislation. Bibliography on 

industrial hygiene, trial list of references on occupational 
diseases and industrial hygiene. 

American labor legislation review 2:367-1+17, June 1912. 

5 






6 


American association for labor legislation. Comfort, health 
and safety in factories. 

American labor legislation review v. 1, no. 2, June 1911. 

Comparative analysis of existing laws in the several states, 
prepared under the direction of Prof. J. R. Commons. 

- Employers’ liability legislation in various states. 

Review of legislation no. 1, p. 10-15, 1909. 

- Report of special committee on standard schedule for 

reporting of industrial accidents. 

American labor legislation review 2:65-87, Feb. 1912. 

Andrews, J. B. Industrial diseases and occupational standards. 

9 p. 1910. 

- Reports of occupational diseases and accidents [in va¬ 
rious states during 1911]. 

American political science review 6:21+0-1+2, May 1912. 

Bailey, W. F. Treatise on the law of personal injuries, includ¬ 
ing employers’ liability, master and servant, and the 
workmen’s compensation act. 3 v. Chic. 1912. 

Bartlett, G. A. Industry’s responsibilities for its accidents. 
100 p. Wash. 1908. 

Belmont, August. Workmen’s compensation and accident pre¬ 
vention. 

National civic federation. Proceedings 1911, 11:227-31. 

Boyd, J. H. Liability legislation, its purpose and methods of 
enforcement. 

Ohio state bar association. Proceedings 1911, 32:90-172. 

- Workmen’s compensation or insurance of workmen and 

their dependents against the loss of wages arising out 
of industrial accidents. 

American journal of sociology 17:51+0-l+-5, Jan. 1912. 

Comparative study of the progress of the legislative move¬ 
ment in the several states of the United States. 

Bradbury, H. B, Bradbury’s Workmen’s compensation and 
state insurance law of the U. S.; a complete analysis 
of the compensation and state insurance laws of all the 






7 


states where such acts have been passed, as well as the 
statutes in complete form, together with the latest 
British compensation act. 1174 p. N. Y. 1912. 

Brantley, W. G. Workmen’s compensation legislation. 13 p. 
1912. 

U. S .— Senate. 62d cong., 2d sess. Doc. no. 905. 

Defense of the federal workmen’s compensation bill, by a 
member of the commission which prepared it. 

Burke, John. Address on employers’ liability and workmen’s 
compensation acts. 29 p. 1911. 

Calder, John. The manufacturer and industrial safety. 

City club of Philadelphia. Bulletin v. 5, no. 6, Jan. 2\\, 
1912. 

- Scientific accident prevention. 

American labor legislation review, v. 1, no. 1/., p. llf-2Jf., 
Dec. 1911. 

Cease, D. L. Compulsory compensation for injured workmen. 

American labor legislation review, v. 1, no. 1, p. hl-^8, 
Jan. 1911. 


Chase, Prentice. Labor, law and justice, a treatise on workmen’s 
compensation. 132 p. Stamford, Ct. 1912. 

Clark, L. D. Liability of employers for injuries ; to employees: 

Workmen’s compensation laws: Negligence of em¬ 
ployees. 

Law of the employment of labor. 1911. ch. 7-9, p. 12£- 
20J>. 


- Workmen’s compensation and insurance; laws and bills, 

1911. 

U' S. — Jjdbor, Bureau of. Bulletin no. 92:98—181 , Jan. 
1911. 

Commissioners on uniform state laws. Compulsory act, uni¬ 
form workmen’s compensation act; tentative draft. 
19p. 1912. 

List of compensation acts in the U. S. is given on p. 2. 





8 


Commonwealth Club of California. Employers’ liability. 
Transactions 6:85-107, June 1911. 

- Workmen’s compensation — employers’ liability. 

Transactions 7 no. 5, Nov. 1912. 

Conference of commissions on compensation for industria 
accidents, Chicago, 1910. Proceedings. 362p. Bost. 
1910. 


Dawson, M. M. Cost of employers’ liability and workmen’s 
compensation insurance. 

TJ. S. — Labor, Bureau of. Bulletin no. 90:7^9-831, Sept. 
1910. 

Contains tables showing premium rates in the various 
countries and states of the United States. 

- Workmen’s compensation; would the best system for gen¬ 
eral welfare be constitutional? 

Survey 26:671-76, Aug. 5, 1911. 


Digest of the 1911 laws of the various states relating to prevention 
of accidents in building construction. 

American legislative review, Oct. 1911. 

Doherty, P. J. Liability of railroads to interstate employees; a 
study of certain aspects of federal regulation of the 
remedy for death or injury to employees in the service 
of interstate railroads. 371p. Bost. 1911. 

Dunham, H. P. comp. Accident insurance. 

Business of insurance. 1912. pt. 1+, v. 2, p. 3-181. 

- Liability insurance. 

Business of insurance. 1912. pt. 5, v. 2, p. 185-371^. 

Eastman, Crystal. Employer’s liability. 

Work accidents and the law. 1910. p. 167-220. 

“Employers’ liability”, a criticism based on facts. 23p 
1909. p 


Work-accidents and the law. 345p. N. Y. 1910. 
Russell Sage foundation. 







9 


Emery, J. A. Workmen’s compensation legislation, compara¬ 
tively and doctrinally considered; taxation basis sug¬ 
gested. 

American bar association. Comparative law bureau. 
Annual bulletin. 1911. p. 17-82. 

Employers’ liability or workmen’s compensation; position of the 
companies. 

Record 86:58-59, Apr. 1912. 

Fessenden, S. D. Present status of employers’ liability. 

Monographs on social economics. 1901. no. If. 


Foot, Alfred. Early history of accident insurance. 

Insurance institute of London. Journal 1:80-Jf9. 
1907-8. 

- Practice of insurance against accident and employers’ 

liability. Ed. 2. 215p. Lond. 1908. 

Freund, Ernst. Constitutional aspects of employers’ liability. 
Green bag 19:80-83. 1907. 


Garrett, C. W. & others. Workmen’s compensation. 

Human engineering v. 2 no. 1, Apr. 1912. 

Accompanied by three charts showing respectively:— 
Chart A. Workmen’s compensation acts prior to 1911. 
Chart B. Workmen’s compensation acts of 1911. 

Chart C. Workmen’s compensation bills proposed by 
organizations. 


Gephart, W. F. Accidents and health insurance. 

Principles of insurance. 1911. ch. 12. p. 290-30 If. 

- Employers’ liability insurance. 

Principles of insurance. 1911. p. 269-79. 

Hadley, H? S. Employers’ liability and workmen’s compensation. 

Governors’ conference. Proceedings. Nov. 1910. p. 
86-93. 


Hamilton, Alice. Occupational diseases. 

National conference of charities and corrections. Pro¬ 
ceedings. 1911. p. 197-207. 


i 




10 


Hard, William & others. Injured in the course of duty; being 
an exposition and some conclusions on the subject of in¬ 
dustrial accidents, how they happen, how they are paid 
for, and how they ought to be paid for. 179p. 1910. 

Harris, H. J. Industrial accidents and loss of earning power; 
German experience in 1897 and 1907. 

U. S. — Labor, Bureau of. Bulletin no. 92:1-96, Jan. 
1911. 

Hatch, L. W. Plan for arriving at uniform accident reports. 

American labor legislation review v. 1 no. l+:128-36, Dec. 
1911. 

Henderson, C. R. Casualty insurance companies. 

Industrial insurance in the U. S. 1909. p. 171+-89, 
339-U. 

- Employer’s liability law. 

Industrial insurance in the U. S. 1909. p. 128-18. 

Hoffman, F. L. Industrial diseases in America. 

American labor legislation review v. 1 no. 1:35-10, Jan. 

1911. 

’ Illinois—Legislature—Commission on occupational diseases. 

Report. 219p. 1911. 

Provisions of protective laws of the United States and Europe- 
p. 173-214. 

International association of accident underwriters. Proceedings 
of the convention, 1901-05, 1907, 1908, 1910, 1911. 

International association of casualty and surety underwriters. 

Proceedings of the convention. 1st, 1911. 

International harvester company. Benefit and pension plans 
for the employees... .rev. issue of May 1,*1912. 39p. 

1912. 

- Industrial accident department. 15p. 1910. 

Judson, F. N. Congressional regulation of employers’ liability. 
Indiana bar association. Report. 1908. p. 53-75. 




11 


Law, F. E. Workmen’s compensation for accidents. 

National association of manufacturers. Proceedings. 
1912. p. 18J/.-207. 


- Prevention of industrial accidents. 194p. N. Y. 1909. 

Legislation for 1911 on employers’ liability, workmen’s compen¬ 
sation and insurance. 

American labor legislation review v. 1 no. 8:87-1 lb, Oct. 
1911 . 

Table giving main provisions of laws of 1911 relative to work 
men’s insurance and compensation p. 103-4. 


Lescohier, D. D. & Garrison, A. O. Workmen’s compensation. 

Minnesota — labor, industries and commerce, Bureau of. 
Biennial report. 18. pt. 1, 1911-12. 

Including table giving comparative summary of laws in force 
in the United States. Bibliography p. 45-48. 

Liability insurance association. Addresses at the annual meet¬ 
ing. 4th, 1910; 5th, 1911. 

Lott, E. S. Advantages of standard accident schedules. 

American labor legislation review, v. 1 no. b, 122-27, Dec. 
1911. 


Main provisions of existing laws relative to reporting of occupa¬ 
tional diseases. 

American labor legislation review, 2:b29, Oct. 1912. 


Main provisions of existing state laws relative to workmen’s com¬ 
pensation and insurance. 

American labor legislation review , 2:b7b, Oct. 1912. 

Massachusetts—Statistics of labor, Bureau of. Bibliography of 

workmen’s compensation acts. 

Bulletin no. 53:15b~56, Oct. 1907. 

- Employers’ liability on railroads. 

Bulletin no. 5b:165-67, Nov. 1907. 

- Federal employers’ liability law held unconstitutional; 

recent court decisions affecting labor. 

Bulletin no. 59:188-90, May, 1908. 

U. S. Supreme court decisions. 





12 


Massachusetts — Statistics of labor, Bureau of. Workmen’s 
compensation acts. 

Bulletin no. 53:153-56, Oct. 1907. 

Mathews, J. M. Employers’ liability and workmen’s compensa¬ 
tion. 

American political science review 5:585-90, Nov. 1911. 


Mercer, H. V. Constitutional problems in workmen’s compen¬ 
sation. 

American association for labor legislation. Labor and 
the courts. 1910. p. 108-20. 

Minnesota—Labor, industries and commerce, Bureau of. 

Accident bulletins. 

- Industrial accidents and workmen’s compensation. 58p. 

1909. 

Bulletin no. 1, Oct. 1909. 

Bibliography p. 57-58. 


Minnesota industrial safety conference. Proceedings, 1911. 
Accident bulletin no. 5, Apr. 1912. 


Moot, Adelbert. National outlook for compensation legislation. 
Survey 27:1905-8, Mar. 9, 1912. 


National association of manufacturers. Digest of workmen’s 
compensation laws, 1912; a reference work for the 
legislator, lawyer, insurance expert, employer and 
employee. 55p. 1912. 

National civic federation. Compensation for accidents. 

Proceedings 11:168-216, 1911. 


Draft of an act to provide compensation for workmen 
injured in certain hazardous industries. 24p. 

Views of legal committee department on compensation 
for industrial accidents and their prevention. 33p. 
1911. 

Workmen’s compensation in the United States. 
Proceedings 12:115-79, 1912. 






13 


National civic federation. Workmen’s insurance in foreign 
countries; employers’liability in the U. S.; compen¬ 
sation for injured wage earners; the prevention of 
industrial accidents; employers’ voluntary relief asso¬ 
ciations ; retirement funds or old age pensions; [papers 
read at the 10th annual meeting]. 

Proceedings v. 10, 1909. 


National conference on industrial diseases. Proceedings. 1st, 
Chic., 1910. 


- 2d, 1912. 

American labor legislation review, v. 2 no. 2, June, 1912. 


National conference on workmen’s compensation. Proceed¬ 
ings 1909-1910. 

National convention of insurance commissioners. Report of 
committee on industrial health and accident settle¬ 
ments. 

Proceedings 1+2:5-51+9, 1911. 

Investigation of settlements with policyholders by companies 
doing an industrial health and accident business. 


National metal trades association-Committee on employers’ 
liability. Proposed bill suggested by committee. 
15p. 1911. 

- - Report. 97p. 1911. 

New Jersey—Labor, Department of. Accident blank for 
reporting accidents in any employment of labor and 
for the use of the employers’ liability commission. 

New York (state)—Library. Select list of references on em¬ 
ployers’ liability. 1910. (Typewritten.) 

Olmstead, V. H., & Fessenden, S. D. Employer and employee 
under the common law. 

Monographs on social economics. 1901, no. 3. 


Optional and compulsory laws. 

Survey 28:357-58, June 1, 1912. 




14 


Parkinson, T. I. Problems and progress of workmen’s compen¬ 
sation legislation. 

American labor legislation review, v. 1, no. 1:55-71, Jan. 
1911. 

Randolph, C. F. Second brief on the legal aspects of systematic 
compensation for industrial accidents, pt. 1. 1912. 

Relation of state to federal workmen’s compensation and insur¬ 
ance legislation. 

American labor legislation review 2:7-61/., Feb. 1912. 

Contents include Compulsory state insurance from the work¬ 
man’s viewpoint, by J. H. Wallace; Accident compensation 
for federal employees, by I. M. Rubinow; Constitutional 
status of workmen’s compensation, by Ernst Freund. 

Risteen, A. D. Accident prevention. 

Bulletin of the Hartford institute v. 5, no. 2, p. 28-28, 
Mar. 1912. 

Comparative study. 

Schwedtman, F. C., & Emery, J. A. Accident prevention and 
relief; an investigation of the subject in Europe with 
special attention to England and Germany together 
with recommendations for action in the United States 
of America. 481p. N. Y. 1911. 

Seager, H. R. Industrial accidents, illness and premature death. 

Social insurance. 1911. p. 21^-82. 

Shadwell, Arthur. Workmen’s compensation and insurance. 

Industrial efficiency. 1909. p. 1^02-122. 

Sherman, P. T. Compensation commissions; a review of legis¬ 
lation proposed in seven states with respect to work 
accidents. 

Survey 25:91^9-62, Mar. I, 1911. 

Stetson, F. L., & others. Memorandum submitted by certain 
law members of the committee of the National civic 
federation, before the congressional commission on 
employers’ liability and workmen’s compensation. 
36p. 1911. 

Streightoff, F. H. Health. 

Standards of living among the industrial people of Am¬ 
erica. 1911. ch. 9, p. 121-25. 


15 


Strong, Josiah. Our industrial juggernaut; [or, Industrial acci¬ 
dents in the United States]. 

North American review 188:1080-86, Nov. 16, 1906. 

Summary of the laws of other countries on the subject of work¬ 
men’s compensation, including the federal employers’ 
liability act of 1908, the government employees’ com¬ 
pensation act of 1908, and the British workmen’s 
compensation act of 1906. 57p. 1912. 

U. S .— Senate. 62d cong., 2d sess.. Doc. no. 61+8. 

Swedtman, F. C. Voluntary indemnity for injured workmen. 

American labor legislation review v. 1 no. 1:1+9-51*, Jan. 
1911. 


Talbot, Winthrop, comp. Select bibliography of recent publica¬ 
tions in the helpful relations of employers and em¬ 
ployed. 112p. Cleveland 1912. 

Taylor, W. I. Employers’ liability to their workmen for accidents 
incurred in the course of their employment and state 
regulation of dangerous industries. 125p. N. Y. 

Thesis, Ph.D. Columbia. 


Thornton, W. W. Treatise on the federal employers’ liability and 
safety appliance acts. Ed. 2. 755p. Cincinnati, 

Ohio. 1912. 


U. S.—Commission on employers’ liability and workmen’s 
compensation. Hearings. 1911-12. 


Report. 2 v. Wash. 1912. 

U. S .— Senate. 62d cong. 2d sess. Doc. no. 888. 


U. S.— Congress — House. Compensating government em¬ 

ployees for injuries sustained in employment; debate in 
the House of Representatives, May 16, 1908. 
Congressional record, 60th cong. 1st sess., v. 1+2 pt. 
7:61+12-17. 

- Compensation of employees of the United States for in¬ 
juries ; debate in the House of Representatives, Dec. 
6, 1911. 

Congressional record, 62d cong. 2d sess. v. 1+8 pt. 1:1+9-50. 




16 


U. S.—Congress—House. Debate in the House of Representa¬ 
tives, Feb. 23, 1910, on a bill (H. R. 17263) to amend 
an act entitled ‘‘An act relating to the liability of 
common carriers by railroads to their employees in 
certain cases.” 

Congressional record, 61st cong. 2d sess. v. 1+5 pt. 
8:2258-60. 


U. S.— Congress — Senate. Employers’ liability bill; debate 

in the Senate, Apr. 9, 1908. 

Congressional record, 60th cong. 1st sess., v. 1+2 pt. 

5:1+526-50. 

- Debate in Senate on House bill 17263, concerning lia¬ 
bility of common carriers to employees, Mar. 31, 1910. 
Congressional record, 61st cong. 2d sess., v. 1+5 pt. 

1+:J+08J+-51. 

- Debate in the Senate, Apr. 1, 1910, on the liability of 

common carriers to employees. - 
Congressional record, 61st cong. 2d sess., v. 1+5 pi. 

1+:1+091-1+102. 


U. S.—Interstate commerce commission. Memorandum treat¬ 
ing of reasonable care, its origin and application. 
75p. Wash. 1907. 

U. S.—Judiciary, House committee on. Federal employees’ 
compensation bill, report to accompany H. R. 20995, 
Apr. 20, 1912. 

U. S. House of representatives. 62d cong. 2d sess. Re¬ 
port no. 578. 

Contains summary of the various liability and compensation 
acts of foreign countries, showing how government employees 
are treated in the respective countries. 


Liability of employers; report to accompany H. R. 
20310. 98p. Wash. 1908. 

U. S.—House of representatives. 60th cong. 1st sess. 
Report no. 1886. 


U. S.—Judiciary, Senate committee on. Federal accident com¬ 
pensation bill; report. 1912. 

U. S. — Senate. 62d cong. 2d sess. Report no. 553. 





17 


S. Labor, Bureau of. Compensation to injured government 
employees; regulations issued by the Secretary of com¬ 
merce and labor governing the operation of the govern¬ 
ment compensation act for employees injured in the 
service of the United States; acts of May 30, 1908, 
Mar. 4, 1911, Mar. 11, 1912. lip. Wash. 1912. 

Cost of employers’ liability and workmen’s compensation 
insurance. 

Bulletin no. 90:71+9-881, Sept. 1910. 


Laws of the various states relating to relief funds, insur¬ 
ance of employees, etc. 

Annual report. 1908. 28:757-87. 


List of industrial poisons. 
Bulletin no. 100, May 1912. 


- Recent action relating to employers’ liability and work¬ 
men’s compensation. 

Bulletin no. 90:675-711+, Sept. 1910. 

U. S.—Library of Congress. Select list of references on employ¬ 
ers’ liability and workmen’s compensation. 196p. 
Wash. 1911. 

- Select list of references on prevention of industrial acci¬ 
dents. 1912. (Typewritten) 

- Select list of works relating to employers’ liability. 25p. 

Wash. 1906. 

* 

- Supplementary list of references on employers’ liability. 

1910. (Typewritten) 

U. S.—Supreme Court. Opinion and order delivered Jan. 15, 
1912, known as the opinion on the act of Congress re¬ 
lating to the liability of common carriers by railroad 
to their employees in certain cases. 1912. 

TJ. S.—House of representatives. 62d cong. 2d sesS. Doc. 
no. 586. 

Van Schaak, David. Safeguards for the prevention of industrial 
accidents. 174p. 1910. 


2 









18 


Warner, R. S. Employers’ liability as an industrial problem. 
Green bag 18:185-92, 1906. 

Workmen’s compensation; resume of legislation. 

Corporation trust company journal, no. 27, July-Sept. 
1911. 

Young, R. J. Practicable safeguards and means of preventing in¬ 
dustrial accidents. 

American labor legislation review v. 1 no. 1/. p. 25-^, Dec. 
1911. 


STATES OF THE UNITED STATES 

California—Legislature. Roseberry employers’ liability act. 

14p. 1911. 

Chapter 399 of the Statutes 1911. 

Connecticut—Labor statistics, Bureau of. Draft of workmen’s 
compensation bill. 1911. 

- Legislature. Bills concerning workmen’s compensation 

pending before the joint standing committees on the 
judiciary and labor. 50p. 1911. 

- - Committee appointed to investigate and report re¬ 
garding legislation to regulate the liability of em¬ 
ployers, 1907. Report. 30p. Plartford, 1907. 

- - Report. 23p. Hartford, 1909. 

# Illinois—Labor statistics, Bureau of. Workmen’s compensation 

act, 1912. 35p. Springfield 1912. 

- Legislature. Employers’liability commission. Report. 

249p. 1910. 

Harper, S. A. Workmen’s compensation in Illinois. 28p. 1911. 

Reprinted from the Illinois law review, Oct. & Nov. 1911. 

Indiana—Legislature.. Act concerning the liability of employers 
for injuries and deaths of employees, providing for com¬ 
pensation and damages therefor, defining rules of law, 
procedure and evidence for the trial of such cases, and 
other matters incident thereto ... 4p. 1911. 






19 


Indiana bar association. Employer’s liability. 33p. 1911 . 

Bibliography p. 29-33. 

Iowa Employers’ liability commission. Workmen’s compen¬ 
sation laws, synopsis of recent enactments—resume of 
the industrial accident acts of Ohio, New Jersey, 
Washington, Wisconsin, California, Illinois, Kansas, 
Massachusetts, Nevada and New Hampshire. 13p. 
Des Moines 1911. 

Massachusetts—Industrial accidents, Commission on compen¬ 
sation for. Partial report, lip. 1912. 

House doc. no. 31+6. 

Legislature. Act relative to payments to employees for 
personal injuries received in the course of their em¬ 
ployment and to the prevention of such injuries. 22p. 

1911. 

- Amended workmen’s compensation act. 16p. 

1912. 

Chapter 666, laws 1912. 

- - Industrial accidents, Commission on compen¬ 
sation for. Report. 25p. 1911. 

House doc. no. 300. 

- - Relations between employer and employee, 

Committee on. Report. 118p. Bost. 1904. 

Daniels, N. H., jr. Workmen’s compensation in Massachusetts. 

Stone and Webster public service journal 11:123-29, Aug. 
1912. 

Foss, E. N. Workmen’s compensation for industrial accidents, 
the new Mass, law and the need of uniform legislation 
on this subject in other states, address at the Gover¬ 
nors’ conference, Spring Lake, N. J., Sept. 13, 1911. 
29p. 1911. 

Michigan—Employers’ liability and workmen’s compensation 
commission. Report. 152p. Lansing 1911. 

Minnesota—Legislature—Employees’ compensation commis¬ 
sion. Report. 289p. 1911. 






20 


Lescohier, D. D. Accident records in Minnesota. 

American labor legislation review v. 1 no. If., p. lllf-21, 
Dec. 1911. 


Industrial accidents and employers’ liability in Minne¬ 
sota. p. 125-324. 

Minnesota — Labor, industries and commerce, Bureau of. 
12th biennial report, 1909-10, pt. 2. 

Bibliography p. 320-22. 


New Jersey—Legislature. Act prescribing the liability of an 
employer to make compensation for injuries received 
by an employee in the course of employment. 16p. 
1911. 

- - Employers’liability commission. Report. 1912. 

- - Employers’ liability, Commission on. Report. 

91p. 1911. 

New York (state) — Employers’ liability, Commission on. 

Report to the Legislature.... by the Commission ap¬ 
pointed under ch. 518 of the laws of 1909 to inquire 
into the question of employers’ liability and other 
matters. 3v. 1910-11. 

- Legislature. Senate bill entitled “An act to amend the 

labor law, in relation to employers’ liability and work¬ 
men’s compensation ”. 1912. 

Senate bill no. 1263. 

Alger, G. W. Alger and Slater on the New York employers’ 
liability act. Ed. 2, rev. & enl. 291p. Albany 1907. 

Andrews, J. B. Deaths from industrial lead poisoning, actually 
reported in New York state in 1909 and 1910. 

U. S. — Labor, Bureau of. Bulletin no. 95:260-82, July 
1911. 

Betts, C. H. comp. Betts-Roosevelt letters, a.... discussion 
on... .the New York State court of appeals’ decision 
in the Workmen’s compensation case. 1912. 






21 


Compulsory workmen’s compensation act unconstitutional. 

New York (state)—Labor statistics. Bureau of. Bulle¬ 
tin no. 1+6:57-80, Mar. 1911. 

Gives text of the opinions of the judges of the New York 
Court of appeals. 


Devine, E. T. Progress in the New York Court of appeals [rela¬ 
tive to decisions on workmen’s compensation cases.] 
Survey 29:193-91+, Nov. 16, 1912. 

Employers’ liability act of 1910 [of New York]. 

New York (state)—Labor statistics. Bureau of. Bulletin 
no. 1+6:81-89, Mar. 1911. 

National civic federation. [Copy of the unanimous opinion of 
the Court of appeals of New York, concerning the 
legality of the doctrine of compulsory compensation]. 
36p. N. Y. 1911. 


- Views of legal committee department on compensation 

for industrial accidents and their prevention concerning 
effect of decision of the Court of appeals of the state 
of New York, upon the compulsory compensation 
principle in its relation to uniform state legislation, 
lip. N. Y. 1911. 

Seager, H. R. & others. Court of appeals decision; [uncon¬ 
stitutionality of the New York state compensation law 
of 1910]. 

Survey 26:185-96, Apr. 29, 1911. 


Ohio — Legislature —Employers’ liability commission. Em¬ 
ployees’ compensation code and report on fatal acci¬ 
dents in Cuyahoga county, Ohio, for the period 1905- 

1910. 117p. 1910. 

- - Employers’ liability commission. Report. 2v. 

1911. 


- Liability board of awards. Workmen’s compensation 

act of the state of Ohio (102 O. L. 524). 27p. 1911. 

Schaffner, M. A. Employers’ liability [legislation in Ohio]. 
American political science review 8:63, Feb. 1909. 






22 


Pennsylvania — Industrial accidents commission. Tentative 
draft of workmen’s compensation act. 19p. 1912. 


Rhode Island—Legislature. Act relative to payments to em¬ 
ployees for personal injuries received in the course of 
their employment and to the prevention of such in¬ 
juries. 

Chapter 831, Laws 1912. 


Page, P. E. & others. History and analysis of the Washington 
compensation act.... 

Human engineering 2:11-55, Apr. 1912. 


Washington—Industrial insurance commission. Review of the 
first year’s operation of the Workmen’s compensation 
act. 1912. 

- Legislature. Workmen’s compensation act. 36p. 1911. 

- - Workmen’s compensation (Ch. 74, session laws 

of 1911), with notes; issued by the Industrial insur¬ 
ance commission created by said act. 47p. 1912. 

- - Commission to investigate problems of indus¬ 
trial accidents and to draft bill on employees’ com¬ 
pensation. Report. 48p. 1910. 

West Virginia—Employers’ liability and laborers’ compensa¬ 
tion commission. Report: part 1, Liability and 
compensation laws. 274p. 1911. 

Richter, A. W. Wisconsin’s workmen’s compensation law sus¬ 
tained. 

Journal of political economy 20:180-87, Feb. 1912. 

Wisconsin—Industrial commission. Workmen’s compensation 
act, with notes of legislative committee and forms and 
rules of the Industrial commission. 1911. 

- Labor and industrial statistics, Bureau of. Industrial 

accidents and employers’ liability in Wisconsin, 1907- 
1908. p. 1-143. Madison 1908. 

13th biennial report, pt. 1. 






23 


Wisconsin—Labor and industrial statistics, Bureau of. In¬ 
dustrial accidents in Wisconsin. 142p. Madison 1909. 
lJ/.th biennial report, pt. 2. 

- Legislature—Special committee on industrial insur¬ 
ance. Report. 148p. 1911. 

Bibliography p. 146-48. 


FOREIGN COUNTRIES 


Cary, R. J. [Brief summary of the situation in foreign coun¬ 
tries as to state industrial insurance laws and work¬ 
men’s compensation laws.] 

U. S. — 62d cong. 1st sess.—Commission on employers’ 
liability and workmens compensation. Hearings, 1911. 
v. 2:289-96. 


Forrester, G. P. National insurance scheme in practice. 

New Zealand—Department of labor. Journal 19:621-35. 
Describes the German and British systems. 


Frankel, L. K. & Dawson, M. M. Workingmen’s insurance in 
Europe. 477p. N. Y. 1910. Russell Sage foundation. 
Bibliography p. 437-42. 


Summary of the laws of other countries on the subject of work¬ 
men’s compensation including. .. .the British work¬ 
men’s compensation act of 1906. 57p. 1912. 

U. S. — Senate . 62d cong. 2d sess. Doc. no. 613. 

U. S.—Labor, Bureau of. Foreign workmen’s compensation 

acts. 

Bulletin no. 90:719-1$, Sept. 1910. 


Workmen’s insurance and compensation series, 
no. 1. Care of tuberculous wage earners in Germany. 

“ 2. British national insurance act. 

“ 3. Sickness and accident insurance law of Switzerland. 

Workmen’s insurance and compensation systems in 
Europe. 1911. 





24 


BELGIUM 

Leyal,D.de. Belgian [employers’liability] law of 1903. 
Green bag 18:220-22. 1906. 

FRANCE 

Conner, B. H. Employers’ liability in France. 

Green bag 18:225-27, 1906. 


GERMANY 

U. S.—Labor, Bureau of. Care of tuberculous wage earners in 
Germany. 1912. 

Workmen’s insurance and compensation series no. 1. 
Bibliography p. 173-79. 


GREAT BRITAIN 

Bedwell, C. E. A. ed. [Legislation relative to employers’ liability 
in the British colonies.] 

Legislation of the empire... .1898 to 1907. 1909. 

See index volume, p. 62-63. 


Beven, Thomas. Law of employers’ liability and workmen’s 
compensation act. Ed. 4. 953p. Lond. 1909. 

Beverley, Frank. Digest of cases decided under the [British] 
workmen’s compensation acts of 1897-1906... .with 
the acts of 1906 and 1909, and orders extending the 
provisions of the act of 1906 to additional industrial 
diseases. 152p. Lond. 1910. 

Butterworth’s Workmen’s compensation cases... 4v. Lond. 
1909-11. 

Canada —Labor department. National insurance in Great 
Britain. 

Labor gazette 12:758-61, Feb. 1912. 

Gives brief comparison with German scheme. 


Collett, H. Review of the working of the workmen’s compensa¬ 
tion act. 

Journal of the Insurance institute of Lond. 3:56-88. 


25 


Crane, R. N. Personal injury actions and workmen’s compen¬ 
sation in England. 

Green bag 18:216-19. 1906. 

Employers’ liability. 

Encyclopedia of the laws of England with forms and 
precedents. Ed. 2. 1907 v. 5, p. 208-67. 

Also 3d annual supplement, 1912, p. 17J+-90. 

Gordon, W. E. Cases under the workmen’s compensation acts 
including all cases relating thereto decided in the 
Court of appeal (England), Court of session (Scot¬ 
land), Court of appeal (Ireland), and on appeal there¬ 
from to the House of Lords. Part 1-date. 1912. 

Great Britain—Parliament. Workmen’s compensation; statis¬ 
tics of compensation, and proceedings under the 
workmen’s compensation act, 1906, and the employers’ 
liability act, 1880, during the year 1909. 70p. 1910. 

Liability of the master in case of accident or death. 

Halsbury, ed. Law of England, 1911- v. 20, p. 128- 
2JfS. 

Master and servant—workmen’s compensation. 

Butterworth's 20th century statutes, 1910. v. 3, p. 327- 
87. 

Minton-Senhouse, R. N. ed. Workmen’s compensation cases; 

being reports of cases decided under the workmen’s 
compensation act, 1897, principally taken from the 
Law times reports and the Times law reports, v.1-9. 
Lond. 1902-08. 

Continued by Butterworth’s Workmen’s compensation cases. 

Packer, Launcelot. Workmen’s compensation; history and 
operation of workmen’s compensation in Great Britain. 
71p. 1912. 

U. S. — Senate. 62 cong. 2d sess. Doc. no. 618. 

U. S.—Labor, Bureau of. British national insurance act. 1912. 

Workmens insurance and compensation series no. 2. 

Willes, R. A. Judicial development of the workmen’s compensa¬ 
tion act. 41p. Birmingham* Eng. 1910. 


26 


Willis, W. A. Workmen’s compensation. 

Scholefield, Joshua, ed. Encyclopedia of local govern¬ 
ment. 1908, v. 7, p. 7J+-79. 

Ireland—County court. Workmen’s compensation act, 1906. 
93p. 1907. 

Manitoba—Legislature. Workmen’s compensation act, 1910, in 
force Jan. 1, 1911. 20p. 1910. 

New Brunswick—Legislature. Workmen’s compensation for 
injuries act, in force Nov. 1, 1908. 21p. 1909. 

Nova Scotia—Legislature. Workmen’s compensation act, in 
force Feb. 1, 1911. 69p. 1910. 

Ontario—Workmen’s compensation, Commissioner on. In¬ 
terim report. 

Canada—Labor department. Labor gazette 12:980-82, 
Apr. 1912. 

Quebec—Legislature. Workmen’s compensation act, in force 

Jan. 1, 1910. 6p. 1909. 

- Workmen’s compensation act of Quebec, annotated 

by T. P. Foran. 230p. Montreal 1910. 

Saskatchewan—Legislature. Act respecting compensation to 
workmen for injuries sulfered in the course of their 
employment. 7p. 1911. 


NETHERLANDS 

Pincoffs, A. C. Holland law of master and servant. 

American bar association—Comparative law bureau. 
Annual bulletin, 1909, p. Jj.O-Jj-5. 


ITALY 

Boone, H. B. Workmen’s compensation in Italy. 
Green bag, 18:223-2k, 1906. 

t 



27 


Besso, 


U. S, 


SWITZERLAND 

S. L. Factory law and employers’ liability.*[in Switzer¬ 
land] . 

Cotton industry in Switzerland, Vorarlberq and Italy, 
1910, p. 97-103. 

-Labor, Bureau of. Sickness and accident insurance law 
in Switzerland, 1912. 

Workmen's insurance and compensation series no. 3. 





















































































V D 3 6. 


$ 































C? O . * 


\ 






4 . 


a\ v v . • 8 

aA 0 0 " 0 * <*> n*v o'- ' 0 « o 

*#> f, U -r o ,T> 

N v < 5 vSS\\W* * 5 ^ b 

" *^0* >£mo(fi- «b $ : 


a q 



o ..yjsss*. a . fuiP&s jr 0 <■ vi^*. , 0 !> »k 

%-**•> a° V ^ c> • o »o 0 .o ; ^ 

'a O 0^ y « 0 < \ s Q „ ^ 

> U 4 '*- ^ 

“ /\ 



4 O^ 

-. <0? v<V 

’V V' 

**. \ ** v V^ °< 

*. W • 



* ^ q °» 
0* -‘' 



<( 

0 0 


s * A° , ^ Wo> ~ \' <> ,0‘ o, 'o'. * * A 

0 * t « 1 * * O A c 0 " 0 -» <S> ft Y ,i<, tjA 

° ^ *\ S 5^w > * ^ c u *w?^N o < 

° jP-V '.' 1 ^^^’,' »tllll>'>’ *9 -r. 

^ * W ^ * tG^v1\yoo5* ' ^ ^ * 

V*°*°’ *° ^ •’ y °o '*^* 0° ^ * 

* q, xV 5 .* 4J'. ^ V V .0^ .*_*.•- 

: • 

« .V^. ' - I 




* A y< > 

<y % 

- * 

^ ^ , 0 ^. 



o ^ 

'*0 .«’ ,0 

.0■ »' • °. -> v 

^ ^ ^ \/ / 
v^ ' ; I 


4 V ^ 

iA <\ r. * s .0 

■iP ^ ,0^ ^o " ,4> C 0*»,'<> 

«r rfr. v ^ ^ <Jt • 

A qY . n\ < ^ -L^ o 




4 O 

> V ><v 

^ ^ 4* 

^ <V O \\vv> • 

' 14 / ,.,.\ % “° 5 .f° 


' *^5, *• 

0 ^ <1^ 
vP <y 



<f* ^ 

0* ^ 

</> 

^ r\> 0 

^■, ~.'*4ZV>*? ^ ^ ^ ".1 

^ ^ o ' 


0 

z 


• 

Q> 

0 


Z 

0 













iornnnnt 















































